8 Comments
User's avatar
Codex redux's avatar

But... They're people. They're Chester's family!

What they need is a priest.

Expand full comment
Karl Gallagher's avatar

Do they think like people? Yes. Do they care for Chester like people? Yes.

Are they legally people? No, not yet.

Expand full comment
Codex redux's avatar

YET.

I like that.

Expand full comment
ilzolende's avatar

They're people, but they in some ways have a poor sense of what children need, and adding a human influence into the household seems likely to be beneficial.

Expand full comment
William H Stoddard's avatar

That's a satisfying ending, and a happier one than I looked for. You've managed to tell an interesting story of conflict with no villains—just different understandings, some of which have the potential to go somewhere harmful. And the way it unfolds make me wonder just how consciously strategic Johnson's moves and statements are; you suggest that this isn't her first time on this ride. . . .

Expand full comment
Karl Gallagher's avatar

One of the premises is that the Code Police were stood up after various incidents proved the need for them. They're competent enough to send an experienced agent to a situation which is more of an edge case than usual. The bots are doing their best with orders that were intended for a day trip but wound up being for years. Johnson knows what the "triggers" for the bots are, and is careful to avoid them as much as possible.

Expand full comment
Nicholas David Rosen's avatar

Maureen Johnson — is the name a Heinlein allusion?

Expand full comment
Karl Gallagher's avatar

Probably a subconscious one, yes. I wanted a female name conveying firm authority and that's what the brain popped up with.

Expand full comment